North Korea has tested a low yield nuclear device with 4% of your destructive power of the bomb that the nation dropped on Hiroshima, Japan in the end of World War II. Some think the device was larger but may have failed for technical reasons. We are not familiar with the truth, because the nation has not devoted the resources to be aware of what is really having. If you are astonished, don't be. Intelligence collection is actually a tricky business. When Richard Nixon was President, you will remember that one of our ships, the USS Pueblo was brazenly attacked and hijacked in international waters in 1968, heli-copter flight coast of North Korea. A 82 member crew appeared to be taken prisoner and tortured over an 11 month span before their release has been negotiated. There is such a thing as institutional memory space. The senior members of your military remember the Pueblo incident well, and it continue to influences our behavior towards North Korea. As a strong aside, President Nixon gave a order to attack North Korea in retribution for any Pueblo incident. At plenty of time the President believed an important show of force was essential to dissuade the Koreans right from further provocative acts. Nixon's Secretary of Defense the moment did not carry through the Presidential directive. To your end of his life, Nixon felt the major foreign policy error from his administration was the failure to execute a retaliatory raid against North Korea for any Pueblo capture. The Pueblo incident includes emboldened the North Koreans from the moment. Both the Clinton together with Bush Administrations were aware of the Pueblo incident and also its particular aftermath, when attempting to configure a new US policy towards Upper Korea's nuclear program. We certainly have 37, 000 American soldiers stationed in South Korea keeping our alliance and motivations with South Korea. There's a simple phased troop withdrawal from the South Korea Peninsula coming about. You have to wonder why we are willing to withdraw troops from South Korea in a time when they would like to pursue a nuclear expansion process. The answer is that this part of the world is loaded together with dynamite, and if them blows up, you don't are looking for 37, 000 American troops sitting involved with it. North Korea has among the list of largest stockpiles of artillery weaponry of any army in the world. They are capable of striking Seoul, South Korea's capital from round the border. It was a short while ago reported that Prince Bandar, the Saudi Arabian Ambassador to the nation had a private conversation with President Bush. In the conversation any Prince told the President that the nation should withdraw US troops from South Korea. Bandar felt it was initially too dangerous to leave our soldiers involved with a possible confrontation where our OPTIONS is limited. As Bandar said, without troops on the border, if there's challenge, it's a REGIONAL PROBLEM. With troops, you would've thousands of American lives at risk, and it becomes a major WAR instantly. So what do we do about the North Koreans announcing this testing of a nuclear gun? We have to realize that words have power. We've got to be careful what we all say. President Bush announced the 'axis of evil' speech in the past. He named North Korea and Iraq as two of your three countries. It would seem that he started his anti-terrorism campaign while in the wrong end of everything.
Iraq did not get weapons of mass deterioration (WMD), while North Korea adjusted live with them. Now we're also in a bind. Our defense policy has been altered whereby we will only fight one conflict in one country at the moment, while fighting a holding action inside of a second country. Prior to your Bush Administration holding power, we were postured so that you can fight two simultaneous battles on two fronts. The bad guys know our new policy and will make use of us being pinned off in Iraq to expand their power bases. Since we certainly have a fear of losing pilots or also, having a pilot shot down, we are not carrying out the reconnaissance flights that him and i would normally do above North Korea. The best thing to do right now is to realize that if North Korea can be described as problem for the nation, it is a significantly bigger problem for The japanese, China, Philippines, and South Korea. This is a regional problem in spite of our alliances, and treaty involvements. Its the first thing to build and detonate any nuclear weapon, it's quite another to undertake a long range missile shipping and delivery system. North Korea could fairly easily experience a delivery system capable from hitting the countries with its immediate vicinity. Hitting the nation from a 9, 000 kilometer plus distance is another story, not so easy really. Since the countries bordering North Korea have the most to lose, they must be the ones bearing the brunt of your responsibility for multi-lateral talks among the list of powers involved. The real deal is that North Korea is actually a dictatorship that routinely starves its own people for the benefit of the small leadership which includes basically enslaved the place. This leadership wants that will play the cards that it can. What it at this moment has is nuclear items. They will use this card to maximize whatever concessions they can from the nation and the immediate associated with neighbors. Are we visiting cave, and make concessions to your North Koreans? Of course we are, because that's what superpowers conduct. It's not about appeasement, it is really about business, and why is good business sense. Churchill reported that 'People have associates, nations have interests'. Its in our interest to not ever divert ourselves from the issue of extricating ourselves with a tortuous situation in Iraq. Its costing us treasure, and starting out eat at the sociable fabric our country mainly because Viet Nam did any generation ago. We must put a good face on Iraq to get out. The President probably are not aware of it, but they're on a short leash in Iraq. The American persons are very intolerant of conflicts without objectives that last too long, and that's precisely where George Bush finds himself. It is highly questionable that his party might survive the mid-term elections intact. The country will embrace CHANGE, even from a Democratic party that is devoid of ideas. <! -- google_ad_section_end -->